Global Warming's Bullshit Factor
From Malthus to Captain Planet: The Mechanics of Perpetual Alarm
Malthus
The Malthusian nightmare has always possessed a certain austere elegance, which is why it continues to seduce the anxious and the puritanical. In 1798 the Reverend Thomas Robert Malthus set down his geometric-against-arithmetic theorem with the cool precision of a man who believed he had discovered a law of nature as immutable as gravity. Population, he observed, increases in geometric ratio—1, 2, 4, 8, 16—while the means of subsistence can, at best, advance only arithmetically—1, 2, 3, 4, 5. The result, unless checked, is inevitable misery for the lower orders. In that first edition the only checks were vice and misery, whose candid agencies were war, pestilence, and famine; "moral restraint" was not offered until the much-expanded second edition of 1803, when Malthus set out to soften the harshest conclusions of the original.14 It was a doctrine perfectly calibrated to the nervous conscience of the English ruling class: a theological justification for leaving the poor to their fate while congratulating oneself on having discovered the mathematics of divine providence.
The same argument was dusted off and retailed with apocalyptic packaging in 1968 by Paul Ehrlich in The Population Bomb. The earth, we were assured, was already doomed; hundreds of millions would starve in the 1970s and 1980s; India was finished; the United States itself might not survive the century. Ehrlich's certainty was absolute, his prose feverish, his prescriptions authoritarian. Yet the predicted corpses refused to materialise. The wager that Julian Simon later forced upon him—betting that the real prices of five key metals would fall between 1980 and 1990—exposed the period-dependence of the entire panic. Simon won easily. The metals became cheaper, not dearer. Resources, it turned out, were not fixed stocks but functions of knowledge and capital. Ehrlich's bomb was a dud.
What actually broke Malthus was not moral restraint or the sudden outbreak of planetary altruism. It was the Haber-Bosch process: the industrial fixation of atmospheric nitrogen into ammonia fertiliser, powered by fossil carbon. Without the energy density of natural gas and coal, the synthetic nitrogen that now feeds roughly half the human race could never have been produced at scale. The escape hatch was not virtue; it was chemistry married to hydrocarbons. The earth is not a closed system of fixed arithmetic limits. It is a laboratory whose productivity expands with human ingenuity—provided one does not first strangle that ingenuity with the soft ropes of Malthusian guilt.
And so we arrive at the cartoon catechism that arrived alongside the collapse of the Soviet experiment. Captain Planet premiered in September 1990, fifteen months before the Union was formally dissolved—the sermon was written while the strong men of actually-existing socialism were still being consigned to the dustbin, not after.15 Ted Turner's brightly coloured homily for the post-Marxist age was therefore early rather than late, which is the usual pattern with eschatologies. The capitalists are no longer class enemies but literal pigs—Hoggish Greedly and his snorting cohort, wallowing in pollution and profit. The Planeteers, those five carefully international children, stand in for the transnational proletariat that never quite materialised: Africa, Asia, South America, the Soviet Union itself—Linka was quietly relocated to "Eastern Europe" only once the Union had ceased to exist—and, of course, the combustible North American who is granted the element of Fire as a none-too-subtle reminder of his civilisational arson. The class struggle is quietly retired; the struggle for Mother Earth is declared permanent. The same moral fervour once reserved for the dictatorship of the proletariat is now redirected toward the dictatorship of the carbon budget. Family size, once a private decision, becomes a public offence—except, naturally, when the families in question are not the ones the sermon-givers have in mind.
It is an elegant substitution. The geometry of population is retained; only the arithmetic of production is denied. The earth, we are told, can no longer provide. Yet the same civilisation that invented Haber-Bosch continues to invent. The only scarcity that remains permanent is the scarcity of intellectual honesty among those who prefer the comforts of apocalypse to the responsibilities of abundance.
The gap is the doctrine. What closed it was not restraint but the Haber-Bosch process — nitrogen fixed with fossil carbon, now feeding roughly half the human race.
Forty-Four to Sixty-Four South
There is a corridor of the planet that has not warmed.
It runs from 44°S to 64°S — a ring of open water and relentless westerly wind circling Antarctica, crossing no continent and containing almost no one. It constitutes 10.2 percent of the Earth's surface. In NASA's own zonal temperature series its trend since 1979 is −0.018 °C per decade. Negative. Everything north of it warmed. The corridor immediately above it warmed at 0.133. The Arctic warmed at 0.668 — thirty-seven times faster and in the opposite direction.1
The number carries a qualifier: p = 0.11. It is not statistically distinguishable from zero. The corridor is flat, not cooling, and anyone who reports it as cooling without the caveat is performing the exact operation this article exists to examine. The cut works both ways; the second cut is the sharper.
GISTEMP v4 zonal annual means, ordinary least squares. The 64S–44S corridor is flat — and it is a tenth of the surface of the Earth. Published global trend for the same window: 0.189.
The convention that lets you skip it
You have never seen this corridor. What you have seen is 1.2 °C, or 1.5 °C, or "hottest year on record" — one number for one planet.
That number is not a measurement. It is an average of averages, and the averaging is a convention. Temperature is an intensive property; averaging intensive quantities has no thermodynamic meaning. A bucket at 10° and a bucket at 40° do not jointly possess a temperature of 25°. Three researchers made precisely this argument in the Journal of Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics in 2007; their sharpest observation was that the sign of the trend is not intrinsic to the data but a property of the averaging rule one elects to apply.2
So test it. Take NASA's eight latitude corridors and reweight them — not by area, but by anything. Equal weight. Tropics only. Poles only. Inverse area. Then throw twenty thousand random weight vectors at the series and observe the result.
Every draw lands right of zero. Number of the twenty thousand producing a cooling Earth: none.
Range: 0.042 to 0.559 °C per decade. Number of draws that produce cooling: zero. Not one in twenty thousand.3
The sign survives. You can flip it only by adversarial loading — placing 92 percent of the weight on the single coolest corridor, nine times its true share of the planet. That is the price of a cooling Earth, and the price itself is the argument against the claim.
The convention is bad, and the conclusion it supports is right anyway. Two separate findings.
Most writing on the subject will give you only one of them.
The price of a cooling Earth
What the corridor actually does to the models
Now the part that is not reassuring.
The global mean conceals the corridor. Once examined, the corridor breaks something. Observations of the Southern Ocean between 40°S and 60°S show cooling of 0.08 K across 1979–2013. The historical model runs warm the same water by 0.37 K over the identical window. Opposite sign, and the discrepancy is roughly five times the size of the observed signal. In the Pacific sector, where the cooling is strongest, observations give −0.098 °C per decade against model regressions of −0.025, −0.014, and −0.002.4
This is not a contrarian reading of ambiguous data. A 2025 paper in Geophysical Research Letters opens by stating, as settled background rather than a claim requiring defence, that climate models generally overestimate observed Southern Ocean surface warming over the past three decades. Observations over 1979–2014 show Antarctic sea ice expanding while models mostly simulate the opposite. Ice grew where the models grew water.5
The ensemble is not divided on the point. Of 365 model ensemble members examined for the 1979–2022 period, 35 reproduce a negative Southern Ocean trend. The other 330 do not. Under ten percent.6
Not a magnitude dispute. The sign is inverted, and the gap is about five times the observed signal.
Hedge, shield, sword
Convention now ceases to be a technical choice and begins to do work.
Hedge
Every paper cited above analyses 1979–2013 or 1979–2014. One states its reason outright: that window was selected because the observed cooling is most prominent there. After 2016 the Southern Ocean warmed sharply and Antarctic sea ice collapsed. Extend the record to 2022 — as this article does — and the corridor moves to −0.018 with p = 0.11. Flat. The dramatic version of the story requires a window that closed a decade ago; any writer who quotes the 1979–2013 figures without disclosing the selection has tuned the period until the output matched the preferred answer. That is the same operation as adjusting a parameter until the model delivers the result already desired.
Shield
The model-observation gap has explanations, and they are real physics rather than excuses. Underestimated freshwater flux from Antarctic ice loss accounts for up to 60 percent of the discrepancy over 1990–2021. A kilometre-scale coupled model, ICON, reproduces the observed Southern Ocean and southeast Pacific cooling closely where CMIP-class models cannot — implicating grid resolution and unresolved eddies rather than broken theory.7 Both are good science. Both also function, in the hands of anyone quoting them, as a reason not to update: the models are wrong, we know why, it is being fixed. The same defence would be available if the models were wrong for reasons nobody had yet discovered. A mechanism that explains a failure is not the same as a mechanism that has been shown to be the failure. The distance between those two statements is where a shield lives.
Sword
And then there is the version that skips all of it. One-tenth of the planet has not warmed in forty-four years; the models get the sign backwards; nine out of ten ensemble members fail — therefore the entire edifice is fraudulent. Every clause true, conclusion unearned. The corridor is flat, not cooling. Its p-value is 0.11. The sign of the global trend survived twenty thousand arbitrary weightings. And the strongest recent result on this question — the kilometre-scale run — points toward the models being fixable, which is not what a hoax looks like.
The corridor is a real anomaly, honestly documented by the people whose models it embarrasses, in journals anyone can read. That is the most inconvenient fact in this article, and it belongs to neither side.
Behold, the sea
Strip away everything contested and something remains that no averaging rule can touch.
Ocean heat content is measured in joules — an extensive quantity, additive, conserved, immune to the entire Essex objection. Roughly 90 percent of the planetary energy imbalance ends up there, and it rises monotonically. The isotopic accounting is separate again: fossil carbon carries no ¹⁴C and is depleted in ¹³C; the atmospheric ratio has fallen in step with the CO₂ rise while atmospheric oxygen declines at close to combustion stoichiometry. None of that is a model output. It is mass spectrometry.8
It is not one claim but a ladder, and the rungs have wildly different footing. Almost every dishonest argument one encounters is a slide between rungs. One side says "real," meaning the first three, and imports that confidence into the fifth. The other attacks the fourth — where the uncertainty actually lives, where the Southern Ocean corridor sits — and claims the attack discredits the first three.
Keep looking and the convention shows you which one you are dealing with.
Sensitivity has barely narrowed in forty years. The fifth rung is not on the ladder at all.
The Basket
Global Financing (leaning over the pit): "It puts the sustainable financing framework in the basket."
Africa (looking up, holding a lump of coal): "I just want to build some cheap energy with coal."
Global Financing: "It puts the carbon credits and the green policy papers in the basket… or else it gets the conditional lending again."
Six hundred million people in sub-Saharan Africa have no electricity. That is 47 percent of the population. Under $2.5 billion a year goes toward changing it. Births outrun connections: 19 million people gained access across 2023 and 2024 together, against 23 million in 2019 alone.9
While that happened, the lending rules tightened. In 2019 the African Development Bank stopped funding coal. In 2021 it severely restricted oil and gas. The World Bank followed. Through all of 2024 the AfDB approved no fossil fuel project at all. European campaigners now press its new president to close the gas exemption as well.10
A continent holding a few percent of cumulative emissions must skip the phase every lender used to get rich, on instructions from countries still finishing it.
Germany razed the village of Lützerath in January 2023 to widen a lignite mine. Lignite runs near 1,100 grams of CO₂ per kilowatt-hour, the worst fuel in the European fleet. Three months later Germany shut its last three reactors.11 No conditionality clause attached to any of that.
Convention as a sword. A rule pointed downward that nobody pointed up.
Bring the cost of capital to global averages and the IEA models project project costs falling 15–25 percent. A solar farm in Lagos and its twin in Rotterdam differ mostly by interest rate.12
Now the second floor of the pit. Lending criteria may not be what binds. Money costs more there. Sovereign risk pricing sets the rate, and it throttles a gas turbine as hard as a panel.
Then 2025 sharpens it. Global energy investment hit $3.3 trillion. Development finance institutions have committed hundreds of billions. Across 47 African countries, 322 announced projects totalled 74,461 MW. Installed: 14,589 MW. One fifth.13
Permitting explains that gap. So do offtake creditworthiness and utility balance sheets too weak to carry a power purchase agreement. Lift every fossil restriction tomorrow and most of those 322 projects still never break ground. Permission was never the missing piece.
So the honest version reads worse than either side's. The restriction is real. The asymmetry is indefensible. Removing it would not turn the lights on. Everyone arguing over the basket has the wrong object in view.
Germany
In January 2023 the village of Lützerath was erased so that the Garzweiler II open-cast lignite mine could expand. The fuel extracted there is among the dirtiest in Europe, carrying roughly 1,100 grams of CO₂ per kilowatt-hour and 25–30 percent water by mass. Three months later Germany closed its final three nuclear reactors. The sequence is not subtle.
Coal's share of German electricity has been declining for years, yet the decline is not the clean story sometimes told. Temporary surges after the Russian gas cut-off and the nuclear exit kept lignite in the mix longer than the rhetoric preferred. The European Emissions Trading System is offered as the elegant counterargument: a rising carbon price should, in theory, price the dirtiest plants out of the market without further political theatre. In practice the price fell. Allowances passed €100 per tonne in early 2023, then averaged €65 in 2024 against €84 the year before, and dropped as low as €52 — a thirty-one-month low that reopened the question of whether the system incentivises anything at all. The slump was attributed to oversupply.16
A cap that binds does not produce those numbers. The instrument offered as the answer was slack while the diggers continued. The same country that lectures poorer nations on stranded assets kept its own most carbon-intensive fuel running while extinguishing its lowest-carbon baseload.
The contradiction is not hidden. It is simply not allowed to disturb the moral vocabulary applied elsewhere.
Lignite: ~1,100 g CO₂/kWh, 25–30% water by mass, no abatement path after the Jänschwalde CCS demonstration was abandoned. The price signal meant to retire it went slack instead.
The Grid That Isn't
The advertising is better than the wiring.
China's energy story is sold as a finished future: a "smart grid" already built, solar so cheap it has rewritten physics, coal already in retreat.
A smart grid is not a press release about ultra-high-voltage lines, a "world's largest smart transformer," or a quantum-gadget substation in Hefei whose performance numbers arrive via People's Daily and vanish when you ask for an independent audit. A smart grid is a two-way system. Power must move; so must information. Loads must be visible, addressable, and willing to move when the system asks. That last part requires appliances and industrial equipment that can receive a signal, delay a cycle, shed a kilowatt, and report that they did so. Without that last mile of obedient machines, you have a very large, very expensive one-way highway with prettier substations. China has built the highway. The appliances that would make it smart remain, in the mass, ordinary — and where residential aggregation does exist, it runs through a handful of manufacturers' cloud platforms rather than through anything the grid can address directly.
Distributed solar has grown faster than the distribution system can see or absorb it. Congestion and connection limits have shown up across provinces. Clean power is being thrown away at industrial scale: 360 terawatt-hours in the first half of 2026, a 49 percent increase year on year and roughly Mexico's entire annual electricity consumption, discarded because the wires and the markets cannot take it when the sun and wind arrive together. The National Energy Administration puts curtailment at 8.6 percent of solar output and 9.1 percent of wind. Global Energy Monitor and CREA, using weather-adjusted data to catch what goes unreported, put it at 26.1 percent. The gap between those two numbers is the story. So is the fact that the NEA stopped publishing monthly provincial curtailment data in March 2026.17 The waste is now large enough to move capital: new solar installations fell 66 percent in 2026, driven by curtailment and by the removal of the guaranteed fixed price.18
360 TWh discarded in six months — roughly Mexico's annual consumption. The gap between the two estimates is the story; the NEA stopped publishing monthly provincial data in March 2026.
On 3 August 2024 a low-frequency power oscillation in Xinjiang, home to some of the world's largest wind and solar farms, severely threatened grid stability across the northwest and potentially nationwide. The NEA attributed it to inadequate management of local unit operations and a failure to activate a system stabiliser mandated by China's own safety standards. Oscillations are not unique to renewable grids, but they are particularly relevant to them.19 The proximate cause was procedural rather than technological, which is worse: the hardware was there and the operating discipline was not. It was the sound of a "smart" system still behaving like a 20th-century machine with 21st-century nameplates.
Solar cells do not repeal thermodynamics. They relocate it. The monocrystalline module that looks like climate policy on a rooftop is, in its Chinese factory life, a petroleum-and-coal project. Polysilicon is an electricity hog. Industrial silicon is cooked with petroleum coke, charcoal, and coal. Glass is melted on fossil heat. Aluminium frames ride the same dirty grid. Most of the world's cells and modules still come from that chain. Intensity per watt has fallen; absolute emissions of the industry have not vanished. Much of the dirtiest step sits in coal provinces. A panel can be "green" at the meter and brown at birth. Calling the factory a climate solution because the product is a climate product is the same category error as calling a coal plant clean because it sometimes charges a battery.
Coal has not left. Output hit a record in 2025 even as thermal generation finally ticked down a percent — the first such decline in a decade, and it is expected to reverse in 2026.20 China still burns more than half the world's coal. New coal capacity continues to be permitted and built as "firm" backup for a grid that cannot yet trust its own renewables. That is not a transition completed. It is a dual system: record clean additions on top of a fossil spine that the state will not amputate.
Tuberculosis is the part of the ledger that does not appear in inverter catalogues. China recorded an estimated 696,000 new cases in 2024, roughly 6.5 percent of the global total and among the four largest absolute burdens in the world. The incidence rate, at about 52 per 100,000, sits well below the global average of 131, and China did meet its 20 percent reduction target — the burden is a function of population size as much as of failure. The number that does not flatter is the resistant one. China accounted for 7.1 percent of global multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant TB in 2024, some 28,000 cases, second in the world after India, and remains on all three of the WHO's high-burden lists.21 The disease tracks crowding, migration, weak rural systems, and age. It is not a romantic relic. It is what a middle-income industrial state looks like when the cities gleam and the hinterland still coughs.
Put the pieces together and the claim collapses into a sentence. A grid is not smart because you say it is. Solar is not clean because you ship it. Coal is not gone because you installed something else beside it. And a country running the world's second-largest drug-resistant tuberculosis burden has not finished the 20th century, let alone invented the 21st. The future, in this telling, is a brochure. The present is coke ovens, dumped electrons, and a bacillus that never read the five-year plan.
Loving the planet
The abstract love of the planet is cheap. It requires only the correct posture and the correct vocabulary. Concrete love is more demanding and far less photogenic. It begins with large gardens — not decorative patches but productive ground measured in acres where possible, in back lots and municipal edges where necessary.
It continues with actual farming: soil kept alive, rotations observed, manure and compost returned rather than trucked away as waste. Clean water is local before it is global; aquifers and watersheds protected by those who drink from them. Clean air is the air outside the kitchen window, not a negotiated parts-per-million target in a distant capital. It means buying and making things that last — tools, furniture, clothing, machines — so that the volume of objects passing through a life declines.
It means state-of-the-art waste systems: engineered landfills that do not leak, anaerobic digesters, and genuine waste-to-energy plants that recover heat and power instead of simply burying or exporting the problem. Trash is not an embarrassment to be hidden; it is a feedstock to be managed with the same seriousness once reserved for coal or oil.
None of this requires a global treaty. It requires competence, continuity, and the willingness to measure success by the condition of the place one actually lives in. The rest is sermon.
The Trident, if not for you, then for Poseidon
There is a certain class of question that arrives already compromised. "Is global warming real?" belongs in that category. It does not invite inquiry so much as it demands a loyalty oath. The interrogator has usually decided in advance what answer will mark you as serious, moral, or permanently beyond the pale. The question therefore deserves the fork: it is forked at the root by dishonest actors on every side, each of them more interested in the political utility of the weather than in the weather itself.
A more honest instrument is the trident. Three points, not two. And the governing spirit should be devotion to Poseidon — concern for safe seas rather than for the next sermon.
First tine · left-of-left
Yes, we are killing the planet. The ice is vanishing, the oceans are rising, the children will inherit a furnace. Therefore we must act with revolutionary urgency. The same people who issue this diagnosis will, in the next breath, urge the rapid construction of more coal-fired power stations in China, or at least remain serenely untroubled by the fact that such stations continue to open at a rate that mocks every Western carbon target. The contradiction is not accidental. It is the price of maintaining a politics in which Western self-flagellation is the highest moral good, while actual emissions elsewhere are treated as someone else's original sin. The atmosphere, inconveniently, does not recognize the distinction.
Second tine · right-of-right
Yes, the earth has warmed. It has always warmed and cooled according to rhythms older than any industrial revolution. To insist that the recent rise is predominantly anthropogenic is to confuse correlation with causation and to elevate computer models above the historical record. The sun, the oceans, and natural variability remain the decisive players; human contribution is a rounding error inflated into catastrophe by those who require a permanent emergency. This position has the virtue of refusing panic. It also has the defect of treating any evidence of human influence as inherently suspect, as if the same industrial civilization that produces antibiotics and fertilizers could not also produce measurable effects on the composition of the air. It has a further defect, which is that the attribution does not rest on models at all. Fossil carbon carries no ¹⁴C and is depleted in ¹³C; the atmospheric ratio has fallen in step with the rise while oxygen declines at close to combustion stoichiometry. That is mass spectrometry, not simulation, and this tine has no answer to it.22
Third tine · here is the math
The least theatrical and therefore the most useful. Atmospheric CO₂ has risen. Global mean surface temperature has risen. The rate and the attribution remain contested in the details, but the broad direction is not. The serious argument is no longer about whether the planet has warmed; it is about magnitude, sensitivity, cost, and the competence of the proposed remedies. Any decisive public answer — whether the apocalyptic or the dismissive — tends to come from one of two sorts of people: a right-winger who is good company and refuses to be stampeded, or a leftist who is not good company and cannot stop himself from moralizing. The rest of us are left to weigh the numbers without the benefit of either tribe's certainty.
The proper posture is a cold appraisal of risk, trade-off, and the limits of human foresight.
The climate will change whether or not we pass another resolution. The question is whether we will meet that change with clear eyes or with the same mixture of hysteria and hypocrisy that has already made the conversation nearly uninhabitable.
Notes
- NASA GISTEMP v4 zonal annual means, 1880–2022, eight latitude corridors. Trends by ordinary least squares. Area weights computed as (sin φ₂ − sin φ₁)/2 per corridor; reconstruction against GISTEMP's published global column agrees to 0.016 °C mean absolute error, r = 0.998. Satellite era (1979–2022) by corridor, °C/decade: 0.138; −0.018; 0.133; 0.119; 0.156; 0.290; 0.308; 0.668. Published global: 0.078 (1880–2022) and 0.189.
- Essex, McKitrick & Andresen (2007).
- 20,000 weight vectors drawn uniformly from the 8-simplex (Dirichlet, α = 1), applied to the same corridor series. 1979–2022 range 0.042 to 0.559 °C/decade; 1880–2022 range 0.060 to 0.158. Zero negative draws in either period. Adversarial minimum — all weight on the single coolest corridor — is −0.018 for 1979–2022; reaching exactly zero from an otherwise area-weighted mean requires 92.2% weight on 64S–44S, against its true area share of 10.2%.
- Kang et al. (2023); Zhang et al. (2024).
- Kaufman et al. (2025); Zhang (2025).
- Zhang et al. (2024). 35 of 365 members.
- Kaufman et al. (2025) for the freshwater flux attribution; Segura et al. (2026) for ICON.
- Corridor definitions differ between this article's own analysis and the literature it cites, and the difference should not be papered over. GISTEMP's 64S–44S is surface air temperature over a latitude corridor including land. The Southern Ocean literature uses sea surface temperature, typically 40–60°S or the Pacific sector 50–70°S. Overlapping, not identical. Any number moved between the two without saying so is being smuggled.
- IEA, Access to electricity in sub-Saharan Africa (2024–25).
- AfDB coal financing cessation (2019); oil and gas restrictions (2021); zero fossil approvals (2024).
- See the Germany section. Lignite is 25–30% water by mass, giving it the worst emissions intensity per kilowatt-hour of any fuel in the European fleet, and no abatement path after Germany abandoned the Jänschwalde CCS demonstration.
- IEA cost-of-capital modelling for African energy projects.
- 2026 analysis of announced versus installed African generation capacity, 47 countries.
- Malthus, An Essay on the Principle of Population, first edition 1798, second edition 1803. The 1798 text admits only two checks, vice and misery; moral restraint is introduced in 1803.
- Captain Planet and the Planeteers premiered on TBS on 15 September 1990. The Soviet Union was formally dissolved on 26 December 1991. Linka's origin was given as the Soviet Union and altered to "Eastern Europe" only after the dissolution.
- EU ETS allowance prices: above €100/tonne February 2023; 2023 annual average €84; 2024 annual average €65; low of approximately €52 in early 2024, described at the time as a thirty-one-month low attributed to oversupply. Price as of March 2026 approximately €73, still below the 2023 peak.
- Global Energy Monitor and Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air, curtailment estimate for H1 2026: 360 TWh, +49% year on year, 26.1% of total wind and solar generation on weather-adjusted data. NEA figures for the same period: 8.6% of solar output, 9.1% of wind. The NEA ceased publishing monthly provincial curtailment data in March 2026.
- Reported 66% decline in new Chinese solar installations in 2026, attributed to curtailment and to the removal of the guaranteed fixed price for renewables.
- NEA notice on the low-frequency power oscillation of 3 August 2024 in Xinjiang, reported December 2024: cause given as inadequate management of local power unit operations and failure to activate a mandated system stabiliser.
- Chinese coal output record 2025 against a roughly one percent decline in thermal generation, the first in a decade; coal-fired generation forecast to rise again in 2026. Coal capacity approvals 2021–Q3 2025 of approximately 340 GW per Global Energy Monitor / CREA.
- WHO Global Tuberculosis Report 2025 (2024 data): China 696,000 incident cases, incidence 52 per 100,000 against a global average of 131; 28,000 MDR/RR-TB cases, 7.1% of the global total, second after India. China appears on all three WHO high-burden lists, 2021–2025.
- Isotopic attribution of the atmospheric CO₂ rise: the Suess effect. Fossil carbon is depleted in ¹³C and contains no ¹⁴C, having decayed past twenty half-lives underground. The atmospheric ¹³C/¹²C ratio has declined in step with the CO₂ increase; atmospheric O₂ declines at approximately combustion stoichiometry. Volcanic, oceanic and biological sources carry different isotopic signatures. Established by Suess (1955) and Revelle & Suess (1957), and independent of any general circulation model.
Sources
Essex, C., McKitrick, R., & Andresen, B. (2007). Does a Global Temperature Exist? Journal of Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics, 32(1), 1–27.
GISTEMP Team (2023). GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP), version 4. NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies. Zonal annual means table.
Hausfather, Z., & Peters, G. P. (2020). Emissions – the 'business as usual' story is misleading. Nature 577, 618–620.
Hausfather, Z., Marvel, K., Schmidt, G. A., Nielsen-Gammon, J. W., & Zelinka, M. (2022). Climate simulations: recognize the 'hot model' problem. Nature 605, 26–29.
Kang, S. M., et al. (2023). Recent global climate feedback controlled by Southern Ocean cooling. Nature Geoscience.
Kaufman, Z., et al. (2025). The Impact of Underestimated Southern Ocean Freshening on Simulated Historical Sea Surface Temperature Trends. Geophysical Research Letters, 2024GL112639.
Kiehl, J. T. (2007). Twentieth century climate model response and climate sensitivity. Geophysical Research Letters 34, L22710.
Lewis, N. (2023). Objectively combining climate sensitivity evidence. Climate Dynamics 60, 3139–3165.
Malthus, T. R. (1798; 2nd ed. 1803). An Essay on the Principle of Population.
Revelle, R., & Suess, H. E. (1957). Carbon dioxide exchange between atmosphere and ocean and the question of an increase of atmospheric CO₂ during the past decades. Tellus 9, 18–27.
Segura, H., et al. (2026). Km-scale coupled simulation and model–observation SST trend discrepancy. PNAS, 2522161123.
Sherwood, S. C., et al. (2020). An assessment of Earth's climate sensitivity using multiple lines of evidence. Reviews of Geophysics 58, e2019RG000678.
Zhang, X., et al. (2024). Recent Multi-Decadal Southern Ocean Surface Cooling. NCAR OpenSky 26828.
Zhang, L. (2025). Simulated Antarctic sea ice expansion reconciles climate model with observation. npj Climate and Atmospheric Science.
